lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: sys_paccept: disable paccept() until API design is resolved
On 09/16, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>
> Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> > * The behavior of paccept() when interrupted by a signal is IMO
> > strange:
>
> You use your own opinion as the deciding factor?

It would be very strange if Michael used the somebody else's opinion ;)

> The behavior differs
> from other uses but is consistent with the accept() behavior.

And Michael asks why this behaviour (and paccept() itself) is useful.
I must admit I don't understand this too.

It is very possible that we both just need the help from expert (you).
(Ulrich, there is no irony, seriously).

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-17 16:27    [W:0.052 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site