Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:30:42 +0400 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: sys_paccept: disable paccept() until API design is resolved |
| |
On 09/16, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > > * The behavior of paccept() when interrupted by a signal is IMO > > strange: > > You use your own opinion as the deciding factor?
It would be very strange if Michael used the somebody else's opinion ;)
> The behavior differs > from other uses but is consistent with the accept() behavior.
And Michael asks why this behaviour (and paccept() itself) is useful. I must admit I don't understand this too.
It is very possible that we both just need the help from expert (you). (Ulrich, there is no irony, seriously).
Oleg.
| |