Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:44:22 -0700 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] introduce boot_printk() |
| |
Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:06 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > >> Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> >>>> every subsystem will have >>>> x86_printk >>>> acpi_printk >>>> pci_printk >>>> >>> doesn't sound like an easily extensible interface, better would be >>> extending printk with a KERN_subsys tag like proposed. >>> >>> >> That would be my thinking too. >> > > will be printk(KERN_PCI, KERN_DEBUG ".....") ? > and it will be ...KERN_PCI will be int? >
#define X86_DEBUG KERN_DEBUG SUBSYS_X86 ... printk(X86_DEBUG "woozle failed the wibble\n);
J
| |