Messages in this thread |  | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | | Subject | Re: frustrating ath9k issues in 2.6.27-rc6-00036-ga551b98 (Linus pristine tree) | | Date | Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:38:10 +0200 |
On Monday, 15 of September 2008, Steven Noonan wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:> > > On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Steven Noonan wrote:
> > > I just had another incident where it disassociated and refused to
> > > reassociate. I got about 100 of these in my dmesg (fixed by unloading
> > > and reloading ath9k):> > > > Is this a regression from 2.6.26?> > > > ath9k has been recently introduced (i.e. it's new to 2.6.27). So I'm not
> certain how to answer. Correct me if I'm wrong but a regression is a new
> bug for a specific component that did not surface in the previous release,
> correct?
Yes.
> But if the component didn't exist in the previous version, is it still a
> regression?
No, it isn't considered as a regression.
Thanks,
Rafael
|  |