Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:09:51 +0200 | From | matthieu castet <> | Subject | re : Building Kernel with -O0 |
| |
Hi,
last time I check kernel build for x86 and arm with -O0, there was several issues.
First there some code that rely in function inline and code elimination, and cause usage of disable symbol at -O0
#ifdef CONFIG_FOO int foo() { } static inline int toto() { } #else static inline int toto() { return 0 } #endif
if (toto()) foo();
This doesn't work even when using __always_inline (try to build attached undec.c at -O0).
Second, I saw problem with swab macro [1]. When using -O0, __OPTIMIZE__ is not defined, and constant initialisation of some code fails (I don't remeber exactly the case but removing the defined(__OPTIMIZE__) fix the issue).
Next for x86 there a driver with asm optimisation that fail to build because gcc fail to allocate register.
And finaly as Andi say there some code doing check if undefined symbol. For example slab index_of [2]
In the end I build the kernel at -O instead of -O0.
Matthieu
PS : I am not sure __always_inline always work at -O0...
[1] #if defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__OPTIMIZE__) # define __swab16(x) \ (__builtin_constant_p((__u16)(x)) ? \ ___constant_swab16((x)) : \ __fswab16((x))) # define __swab32(x) \ (__builtin_constant_p((__u32)(x)) ? \ ___constant_swab32((x)) : \ __fswab32((x))) # define __swab64(x) \ (__builtin_constant_p((__u64)(x)) ? \ ___constant_swab64((x)) : \ __fswab64((x))) #else # define __swab16(x) __fswab16(x) # define __swab32(x) __fswab32(x) # define __swab64(x) __fswab64(x) #endif /* OPTIMIZE */
[2] static __always_inline int index_of(const size_t size) { extern void __bad_size(void);
if (__builtin_constant_p(size)) { int i = 0;
#define CACHE(x) \ if (size <=x) \ return i; \ else \ i++; #include <linux/kmalloc_sizes.h> #undef CACHE __bad_size(); } else __bad_size(); return 0; } static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int foo() { return 0; }
int main() { if (foo()) bar(); }
| |