[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ktime_set() does not check for nanoseconds > one second
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Matt Fleming wrote:
> is it intentional that ktime_set() does not check whether the
> nanoseconds argument is greater than the number of nanoseconds in a
> second? I've run into a problem where a value of 1600000000
> nanoseconds was passed as an argument to ktime_set() and the return
> value was then used in a ktime_add() call, which returned an incorrect
> result. Should the caller of ktime_set() make this check or is it
> possible to move this logic in to the function itself?

Yeah, a check for this in ktime_set() might make sense. Currently it's
up to the programmer to provide sane values. :)



 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-01 13:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans