Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] kernel-based checkpoint restart | Date | Fri, 8 Aug 2008 20:18:45 +0200 |
| |
On Friday 08 August 2008, Dave Hansen wrote: > I don't think it is the common case. Probably now when we're screwing > around with it, but not in the future. Do you think it is worth adding > the pid=0 handling?
If it's the exception, probably not. Otherwise it would be a nice shortcut to avoid having to do two system calls every time you write code using it. Then again, there are probably not many programs calling it anyway, if it get encapsulated in some user space tool.
Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |