Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:06:17 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Make PFN_PHYS return a properly-formed physical address |
| |
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:45:12 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> Shall we go with just using plain u64 (or unsigned long long if we want > a really consistent type) in the meantime, and then waffle about > introducing a new type everywhere? > > Or we could redefine resource_size_t to be big enough to refer to any > resource, including all memory. It's close to being that anyway.
We could do
typedef resource_size_t jeremy_thing_t;
for now and worry about it later if the need arises, perhaps.
| |