[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/33] dyn_array and nr_irqs support v4
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:35:55 -0700 (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:

> "Yinghai Lu" <> writes:
> >> My suggestion for a non-breaking path:
> >> - Kill NR_IRQS in then generic code.
> >> With Alan's serial patch and my kstat patch it looks like we have
> >> the worst of that.
> >
> > will use Alan's first.
> > already reused your patch about kstat. and move kstat_irqs to irq_desc.
> Part of what I am thinking is that there should never be a patch
> that does s/NR_IRQS/nr_irqs/ that is just pointless noise.
> Either we need a new abstraction like for_each_irq or to update the
> code to the current best practices.
> Which means the patches should be uncontroversial and mergeble on their
> own with no weird dependencies.

A lot of these are range checks so could be replaced by a single
valid_irq(irq) test.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-07 02:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site