[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/33] dyn_array and nr_irqs support v4
"Yinghai Lu" <> writes:

>> My suggestion for a non-breaking path:
>> - Kill NR_IRQS in then generic code.
>> With Alan's serial patch and my kstat patch it looks like we have
>> the worst of that.
> will use Alan's first.
> already reused your patch about kstat. and move kstat_irqs to irq_desc.

Part of what I am thinking is that there should never be a patch
that does s/NR_IRQS/nr_irqs/ that is just pointless noise.

Either we need a new abstraction like for_each_irq or to update the
code to the current best practices.

Which means the patches should be uncontroversial and mergeble on their
own with no weird dependencies.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-06 22:47    [W:0.073 / U:10.984 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site