Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Aug 2008 01:47:42 +0900 | From | "KOSAKI Motohiro" <> | Subject | Re: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finished making slub perform as well |
| |
Hi
> Could you address the performance issues in different ways? F.e. try to free > when the object is hot or free from multiple processors? SLAB has to take the > list_lock rather frequently under high concurrent loads (depends on queue > size). That will not occur with SLUB. So you actually can free (and allocate) > concurrently with high performance.
just information. (offtopic?)
When hackbench running, SLUB consume memory very largely than SLAB. then, SLAB often outperform SLUB in memory stavation state.
I don't know why memory comsumption different. Anyone know it?
| |