lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] ne.c msleep not mdelay
From
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:44:47 +0100, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > So, if rescheduling was dangerous here, we already have potential
> > problems, no?
>
> Yes we do but I didn't manage to stop the other mistakes getting in when
> they did. If you take a schedule you get results back from the probe_irq
> that tend to suck in other random ISA device events (ISA being edge
> triggered nobody was ever careful about spurious irq)

OK, I see your point. Thanks.

---
Atsushi Nemoto


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-31 19:33    [W:0.059 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site