Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:59:06 +0100 | | From | Alan Cox <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ne.c msleep not mdelay | |
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:44:53 -0500
David Fries <david@fries.net> wrote:
> mdelay(10) replaced by msleep(10) to give up the CPU, it's just
> waiting for an interrupt, so timing isn't critical.
It is too critical for a reschedule to occur.
NAK this one.
|  |