lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: C language lawyers needed
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 02:43:05PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Can anyone explain why building the current kernel gives
>
> drivers/net/mlx4/mcg.c: In function 'mlx4_multicast_attach':
> drivers/net/mlx4/mcg.c:217: warning: integer overflow in expression
>
> (with gcc (Ubuntu 4.3.1-9ubuntu1) 4.3.1 on x86-64), while the patch
> below gets rid of the warning? I can't see what is overflowing in the
> expression that is warned out.
>
> MGM_BLCK_LB_BIT is 30, and 1 << 30 is not negative or close to
> overflowing. And MGM_QPN_MASK is 0x00FFFFFF, which is also nowhere near
> to integer overflow.
>
> A fairly small test case that I don't understand either is:
>
> unsigned foo(int x)
> {
> return (((x & 0xffffff) | (1 << 30)) & 0xff000000) >> 24;
> }
>
> just running "gcc -c" (ie no extra warnings enabled) on that produces
> the same:
>
> b.c: In function 'foo':
> b.c:3: warning: integer overflow in expression
>
> I'm sure there's some promotion rule or something that makes sense of
> this, but it's a mystery to me...

There isn't. It's gcc being buggy and inconsistent.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-28 00:11    [W:0.036 / U:0.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site