![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 16:29 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > @@ -26,8 +27,10 @@> > * http://lse.sourceforge.net/locking/rclock_OLS.2001.05.01c.sc.pdf (OLS2001) > > * > > * For detailed explanation of Read-Copy Update mechanism see - > > - * Documentation/RCU > > - * > > + * Documentation/RCU > > + * http://lwn.net/Articles/262464/ (What is RCU, Fundamentally?) > > + * http://lwn.net/Articles/263130/ (What is RCU's Usage?) > > + * http://lwn.net/Articles/264090/ (What is RCU's API? + references) > > */> > Why put these references here rather than in Documentation/RCU? It > seems easier to keep documentation up to date in one place. If you > think these represent a good "getting started" set of documents, how > about a Documentation/RCU/ReadTheseFirst with links to them, or how > about linking to them from whatisRCU.txt? I actually like in code comments and 'documentation' more than Documentation/ stuff. Mostly because Documentation/ is: - far away from the code - therefore, more easily bitrotted - and easily forgotten | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-08-25 12:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||