Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:43:53 -0700 | From | Justin Madru <> | Subject | Re: Backport hr-tick fix into .25/.26 |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > hm, the backport of 31656519 is a bit intrusive. > > find below is an (untested!) version of it - i havent even build-tested > it. Does it work for you? But this is Greg's call really. >
I tried to apply it onto 2.6.26.2, but got this build error:
CC arch/x86/kernel/i8253.o CC kernel/sched.o CC arch/x86/kernel/pci-nommu.o kernel/sched.c:537: error: field ‘hrtick_csd’ has incomplete type kernel/sched.c: In function ‘hrtick_start’: kernel/sched.c:1080: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__smp_call_function_single’ CC arch/x86/kernel/tsc_32.o make[2]: *** [kernel/sched.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [kernel] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... CC arch/x86/kernel/io_delay.o CC arch/x86/kernel/rtc.o CC arch/x86/kernel/trampoline.o
Was I suppose to use a different kernel? (2.6.25[.x] or 2.6.26) I'll try 2.6.25.15
Anyways, I know it's Greg's call, and I'm just trying to inform him of a bug that's been fixed upstream that should be backported. If he declines, that's ok. I've opened a bug report with Ubuntu. But, it would help if I had a patch to show.
Justin Madru -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |