lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Backport hr-tick fix into .25/.26
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> hm, the backport of 31656519 is a bit intrusive.
>
> find below is an (untested!) version of it - i havent even build-tested
> it. Does it work for you? But this is Greg's call really.
>

I tried to apply it onto 2.6.26.2, but got this build error:

CC arch/x86/kernel/i8253.o
CC kernel/sched.o
CC arch/x86/kernel/pci-nommu.o
kernel/sched.c:537: error: field ‘hrtick_csd’ has incomplete type
kernel/sched.c: In function ‘hrtick_start’:
kernel/sched.c:1080: error: implicit declaration of function
‘__smp_call_function_single’
CC arch/x86/kernel/tsc_32.o
make[2]: *** [kernel/sched.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [kernel] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC arch/x86/kernel/io_delay.o
CC arch/x86/kernel/rtc.o
CC arch/x86/kernel/trampoline.o

Was I suppose to use a different kernel? (2.6.25[.x] or 2.6.26) I'll try
2.6.25.15

Anyways, I know it's Greg's call, and I'm just trying to inform him of a
bug that's been fixed upstream that should be backported.
If he declines, that's ok. I've opened a bug report with Ubuntu. But, it
would help if I had a patch to show.

Justin Madru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-19 04:47    [W:0.060 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site