[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: invalidate caches before going into suspend
    Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > also, we might be safer if the wbinvd(), the CLI and the halt was in a
    > single assembly sequence:
    > if (cpu >= i486)
    > asm ("cli; wbinvd; cli; 1: hlt; jmp 1b")
    > else
    > asm ("cli; 1: hlt; jmp 1b")
    > to make sure the compiler doesnt ever insert something into this
    > codepath? [ And note the double cli which would be further
    > robustification - in theory we could get a spurious interrupt straight
    > after the wbinvd. ] Hm?

    Spurious interrupt of what kind? The only things that could come in
    would not be non-INT type interrupts, and those aren't affected by CLI.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-08-13 18:57    [W:0.021 / U:5.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site