Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:51:24 +1000 | | From | Simon Horman <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kexec jump: fix code size checking |
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 01:18:12PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 20:40 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > [...] > > 4) Put the code is a special section .text.kexec? and have the linker > > always do the size comparison and the computation of the section size. > > > > The fewer conditionals we have the less likely something is to break. > > Yes. This one is good. But I think current one is acceptable too.
If you really think that 1) is the best way
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
|  |