lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 12 Aug 2008 12:19:31 +0800
From"Dave Young" <>
SubjectRe: [BUG] wireless : cpu stuck for 61s
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 09:29:26AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>>> With the patch I cann't reproduce the bug with 27-rc1 now.
>>>
>>> >  [<c02375a6>] ? debugfs_create_file+0x46/0x210
>>> >  [<c02375a6>] ? debugfs_create_file+0x46/0x210
>>> >  [<c02375a6>] debugfs_create_file+0x46/0x210
>>> >  [<c02377f1>] debugfs_create_dir+0x21/0x30
>>> >  [<f8901f6d>] ieee80211_sta_debugfs_add+0x2d/0x150 [mac80211]
>>> >  [<f88eba89>] sta_info_debugfs_add_work+0x89/0x130 [mac80211]
>>> >  [<f890a170>] ? rate_control_pid_add_sta_debugfs+0x0/0x30 [mac80211]
>>
>> I wonder if there were two separate problems here.  I looked into
>> this with some detail yesterday and agree with Johannes that the above
>> trace is on locking the parent directory's i_mutex, but I too couldn't
>> see any problems with sta_info_debugfs_add_work.  Other stuff could also
>> modify the directory with or without rtnl_lock, but not in a way that
>> to my untrained eyes would lead to deadlock.
>
> Yes,. I think so. It's the original bug for me, while testing I found
> the mutex deadlock problem.
>
> But this week I will have no time to trace it. so if I have time I
> will keep tracing the problem

Unfortunately I have no more time to do this these days.
As I can't reproduce it with the latest git kernel I think that It
might have been fixed already.

>
>>
>> Or is the trace just wrong?
>>
>> --
>> Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> dave
>



-- 
Regards
dave


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-12 06:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2008