[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectPossible false positive in checkpatch
The following appears to be a false positive in checkpatch:

ERROR: space prohibited after that '*' (ctx:BxW)
#163: FILE: drivers/usb/core/usb.c:304:
+#define usb_device_pm_ops (* (struct pm_ops *) 0)

Certainly this is a rather uncommon code construction, but similar
ones might occur elsewhere. To my eyes,

(* (type *) ptr)

looks better than

(*(type *) ptr)


(*(type *)ptr)

or even


but of course this is a matter of opinion. Is there any strong feeling
about this in the kernel community?

Alan Stern

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-12 16:27    [W:0.037 / U:6.600 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site