lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] kmemtrace: SLUB hooks.
    From
    Date
    Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> writes:

    > [...]
    >> There should be no extra function calls when this is configured on but
    >> tracing disabled. We try very hard to keep the speed of the tracer as
    >> close to a non tracing kernel as possible when tracing is disabled.
    >
    > Makes sense. But then we have even more code bloat because of the
    > tests that are inserted in all call sites of kmalloc.

    Are you talking about the tests that implement checking whether a
    marker is active or not? Those checks are already efficient, and will
    get more so with the "immediate values" optimization in or near the
    tree.

    - FChE


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-08-11 17:41    [W:0.020 / U:12.500 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site