lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [git pull] scheduler fixes
From
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:01:00 +0200

> I'm wondering, does this mean that Peter's:
>
> lockdep: change scheduler annotation
>
> is still not good enough yet?

It doesn't work, the problem is this:

[ 7819.764377] =============================================
[ 7819.775495] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 7819.780969] 2.6.27-rc1-lockdep #12
[ 7819.786256] ---------------------------------------------
[ 7819.791548] cc1/29466 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 7819.796685] (&rq->lock/1){.+..}, at: [<0000000000455548>] double_lock_balance+0x78/0x90
[ 7819.806849]
[ 7819.806859] but task is already holding lock:
[ 7819.815871] (&rq->lock/1){.+..}, at: [<0000000000455538>] double_lock_balance+0x68/0x90
[ 7819.825448]
[ 7819.825456] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 7819.834373] 1 lock held by cc1/29466:
[ 7819.838709] #0: (&rq->lock/1){.+..}, at: [<0000000000455538>] double_lock_balance+0x68/0x90
[ 7819.847818]
[ 7819.847827] stack backtrace:
[ 7819.855832] Call Trace:
[ 7819.859696] [000000000047ecac] __lock_acquire+0xbdc/0xf98
[ 7819.863669] [000000000047f7c4] lock_acquire+0x64/0x7c
[ 7819.867613] [00000000006d67d4] _spin_lock_nested+0x1c/0x58
[ 7819.871612] [0000000000455548] double_lock_balance+0x78/0x90
[ 7819.875600] [00000000006d3afc] schedule+0x324/0x8d0
[ 7819.879536] [00000000004c089c] pipe_wait+0x58/0x8c
[ 7819.883462] [00000000004c0c94] pipe_write+0x3c4/0x480
[ 7819.887597] [00000000004ba150] do_sync_write+0x80/0xd0
[ 7819.891460] [00000000004ba92c] vfs_write+0x70/0x10c
[ 7819.895264] [00000000004bad18] sys_write+0x2c/0x60
[ 7819.899073] [0000000000406294] linux_sparc_syscall32+0x34/0x40

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-01 11:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans