lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:11:03 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Note that the zero-based percpu problems are completely unrelated
> > to stackprotector. I was able to hit them with a
> > stackprotector-disabled gcc-4.2.3 environment.
>
> The only reason we need to keep a zero-based pda is to support
> stack-protector. If we drop drop it, we can drop the pda - and its
> special zero-based properties - entirely.

what's wrong with zero based btw?

do they stop us from using gcc's __thread keyword for per cpu variables
or something? (*that* would be a nice feature)

or does it stop us from putting the per cpu variables starting from
offset 4096 onwards?

--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-09 22:43    [W:0.267 / U:10.904 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site