[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 0/17] Series to introduce WARN()... a WARN_ON() variant that takes printk arguments
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 04:46:13 -0700
Andrew Morton <> wrote:
> Well I haven't got onto processing these patches in detail yet. An
> open questions is why the damn thing was resubmitted from scratch
> when I've already merged it and fixed various rejects and had to fix
> several bugs in it. Do those rejects need to be re-fixed? Were my
> bugfixes folded back? I haven't looked yet. I'll need to generate
> the incremental diff and see what was done.

I started with the version in -mm (and had to do one reject fix against
-next) with folding the 2 -fix's into it.

If you want to reach me at my work email, use
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-09 15:33    [W:0.065 / U:7.852 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site