[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 0/17] Series to introduce WARN()... a WARN_ON() variant that takes printk arguments
    On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 04:46:13 -0700
    Andrew Morton <> wrote:
    > Well I haven't got onto processing these patches in detail yet. An
    > open questions is why the damn thing was resubmitted from scratch
    > when I've already merged it and fixed various rejects and had to fix
    > several bugs in it. Do those rejects need to be re-fixed? Were my
    > bugfixes folded back? I haven't looked yet. I'll need to generate
    > the incremental diff and see what was done.

    I started with the version in -mm (and had to do one reject fix against
    -next) with folding the 2 -fix's into it.

    If you want to reach me at my work email, use
    For development, discussion and tips for power savings,

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-07-09 15:33    [W:0.020 / U:33.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site