lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch 2/17] Add a WARN() macro that acts like WARN_ON()+printk
From
Date
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 09:40 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> +#ifndef WARN
> +#define WARN(condition, format...) ({ \
> + int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition); \
> + if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on)) \
> + __WARN_printf(format); \
> + unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \
> +})
> +#endif
> +

If all current uses of WARN are going to change, perhaps
adding an argument for KERN_<level> or removing the
KERN_<level> prefixes and standardizing on a single
KERN_<level> (KERN_WARNING?) is appropriate.

If not standardizing on a single KERN_<level> prefix,
perhaps change the conditional and using something like:

assert_<level>(cond, fmt, arg...)
or
assert_msg(cond, level, fmt, arg...)




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-08 20:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans