lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Ctrl+C doesn't interrupt process waiting for I/O
Alan Cox wrote:
>> So what kind of data do you want? Someone watching a wallclock while
>> comparing Ctrl-Z+kill versus Ctrl-C on a IO intensive process?
>
> Latency traces with timestamps might be quite useful, they'd probably
> also tell you why it happened.

Ok so you're asking someone else to debug it.

I can't reproduce it, nobody has provided
> numbers so even if I wanted to work on it I couldn't do much.

Well we had a patch (although I haven't tried it yet)

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121489861508496&w=2

Is that not concrete enough?

> Instead I have lots of real tty, ATA and other work that needs doing
> which has quantified data,

All the reporters provided time stamp traces? @)

-Andi


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-05 13:03    [W:0.094 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site