[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: *sigh* /proc/*/pagemap

    On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > int pagecount;
    > int ret = -ESRCH;
    > + static struct mm_walk pagemap_walk;
    > + pagemap_walk.pmd_entry = pagemap_pte_range;
    > + pagemap_walk.pte_hole = pagemap_pte_hole;
    > + = mm;
    > + pagemap_walk.private = ±
    > +

    No can do. You have one single pagemap_walk, but perhaps multiple users,
    who all disagree about what it should contain.

    Quite frankly, I think we should just remove the whole f*cking crap. I
    think it's also potentially a security hole to give physical page
    information and swap info - even if it's just your own pages.

    Matt, can you explain what the point was of this whole thing? I'm really
    _this_ close to just removing the POS right now. It's been a big source of
    bugs, and it looks entirely pointless.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-07-05 19:57    [W:0.020 / U:3.556 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site