Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 5 Jul 2008 16:07:39 +0200 (CEST) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: the printk problem |
| |
On Saturday 2008-07-05 15:50, Vegard Nossum wrote: > >I think the most elegant solution would be a macro similar to the >initcall macros, that adds the custom extensions to a table which is >defined by a special linker section. This allows complete >decentralization, but I don't think it's possible to do binary search >on the names anymore.
With an rbtree, you can still do binary search.
| |