Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 5 Jul 2008 17:00:26 +0300 | From | "Felipe Balbi" <> | Subject | Re: Battery life difference |
| |
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote: > You didn't say which battery you are using; I'm guessing you are using > the 4 cell slim-line battery, which is rated at 28.8 Watt-hours?
yeah, the normal slim-battery.
> How many Watts is Powertop reporting that you are using? I'm down to
eheh, it's only 15.5w :-p
> around 8-9 watts, and around 9.5 watts in "airplane mail reading mail" > (wireless disabled, USB modules unloaded, screen brightness turned way > down, laptop_mode enabled, all mail messages pulled into memory, and > reading/deleting mail using mutt, a character-mode based mail reader > --- if you use Evolution, your energy usage will definitely be higher :-).
no crappy evolution, I use fluxbox and mutt. This ubuntu machine is for testing purposes only :-p
Anyways, it's bad that we have to manually unload several modules, specially usb. I'm sure windows reaches 9 watts consumption without breaking functionality. And that's the big thing. I think that's something we should be aiming. Dontcha think?
> See http://thunk.org/tytso/blog/2007/10/29/tip-o-the-hat-wag-o-the-finger-linux-power-savings-for-laptop-users/
Good article, but still. On the end user point of view, it's difficult to do rmmod/insmod operations. Recently I sent a patch to the bluez team adding a checkbox to bluetooth-properties that would send the SetMode("off") dbus message (which is the same as running hciconfig hci0 down).
That helps a bit, but still the driver is not been used and keeps generating wakeup events. Why if it's not been used ?
Maybe this is something we should start thinking about, right ?
-- Best Regards,
Felipe Balbi felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net
| |