![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi Russel,
Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 04:19:17PM +0200, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * MCI (SD/MMC)
>>>> + */
>>>> +static struct at91_mmc_data __initdata ek_mmc_data = {
>>>> + .slot_b = 1,
>>>> + .wire4 = 1,
>>>> +// .det_pin = ... not connected
>>>> +// .wp_pin = ... not connected
>>>> +// .vcc_pin = ... not connected
>>>>
>>> Please make these a proper comment, preferably inside the comment before
>>> the structure. C++ comments are frowned upon in the kernel's source.
>>
>> I would like to know what do you suggest about this comment? Indeed we
>> already use this kind of comments, for instance in board-sam9260ek.c. I
>> don't mind changing it into the proper comment form, but I would like to
>> know first what do you suggest.
>
> Documentation/CodingStyle:
> |
> | Chapter 8: Commenting
> |
> ...
> |
> |Linux style for comments is the C89 "/* ... */" style.
> |Don't use C99-style "// ..." comments.
>
> So how about:
>
> /*
> * MCI (SD/MMC)
> * det_pin, wp_pin and vcc_pin are not connected
> */
> static struct at91_mmc_data __initdata ek_mmc_data = {
> .slot_b = 1,
> .wire4 = 1,
> };
>
It is fine for me, I will change the patch with the proper style for
comments.
BTW I have found the problem in the patch on the patch system, so I will
change that too.
Thank you for your help and comments.
Regards,
Sedji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-07-04 10:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||