Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:38:23 +0300 | From | "Pekka Enberg" <> | Subject | Re: slub: Do not use 192 byte sized cache if minimum alignment is 128 byte |
| |
Hi Yoichi,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >>> The 192 byte cache is not necessary if we have a basic alignment of 128 >>> byte. If it would be used then the 192 would be aligned to the next 128 byte >>> boundary which would result in another 256 byte cache. Two 256 kmalloc caches >>> cause sysfs to complain about a duplicate entry. >>> >>> MIPS needs 128 byte aligned kmalloc caches and spits out warnings on boot without >>> this patch. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:37:52 +0300 "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote: >> Looks good to me. Yoichi, did you have the chance to test this?
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 3:28 AM, Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> wrote: > I've already done. > It has no problem.
Thank you for testing!
| |