lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Fwd: Commit 76a2a6ee8a0660a29127f05989ac59ae1ce865fa breaks PXA270 (at least)?

* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:31:05 +0100
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > But then some bright spark thought it would be a good idea to get
> > rid of printk_clock().
>
> <does git-log, searches for printk_clock>

i think this is a fresh regression via the introduction of
kernel/sched_clock.c. We lost the (known) early-init behavior of
cpu_clock() in the !UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK case. The fix would be to
restore that, not to reintroduce printk_clock().

Peter, any ideas?

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-31 23:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site