lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Fwd: Commit 76a2a6ee8a0660a29127f05989ac59ae1ce865fa breaks PXA270 (at least)?
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:47:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 23:37 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:31:05 +0100
>>>> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But then some bright spark thought it would be a good idea to get
>>>>> rid of printk_clock().
>>>> <does git-log, searches for printk_clock>
>>> i think this is a fresh regression via the introduction of
>>> kernel/sched_clock.c. We lost the (known) early-init behavior of
>>> cpu_clock() in the !UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK case. The fix would be to
>>> restore that, not to reintroduce printk_clock().
>>>
>>> Peter, any ideas?
>> How about something like this, it builds an atificial delay, exactly
>> like we already have for the HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK case.
>>
>> This keeps cpu_clock() 0 until after sched_clock_init().
>>
>> Russell, Bill, is this sufficient?
>
> It looks like it should. Bill - can you test the patch in Peter's mail
> please?

I've got one foot out the door headed towards a business trip. I can check it
out Monday or Tuesday.


b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@billgatliff.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-01 05:47    [W:0.038 / U:0.552 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site