Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 | From | "Zhang, Yanmin" <> | Date | Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:08:37 +0800 |
| |
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 10:35 +0800, Miao Xie wrote: > on 2008-8-1 8:39 Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > [snip] > >> The regression I reported exists on: > >> 1) 8-core+HT(totally 16 logical processor) tulsa: 40% regression with volano, 8% with oltp; > >> 2) 8-core+HT Montvale Itanium: 9% regression with volano; 8% with oltp; > >> 3) 16-core tigerton: %70 with volano, %18 with oltp; > >> 4) 8-core stoakley: %15 with oltp, testing failed with volanoMark. > >> > >> So the issues are popular on different architectures. > > I know kernel needs the features and it might not be a good idea to reject them over and over again. > > I will collect more data on tigerton and try to optimize it. > > Could you tell me the exact config options? the same with last time? Yes.
> > as follows: > > # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set > CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=y > CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y > # CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is not set > CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y > # CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED is not set
| |