Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:27:46 -0400 | From | "Jon Smirl" <> | Subject | Re: 463 kernel developers missing! |
| |
On 7/30/08, Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> wrote: > On 30-07-08 21:41, Rene Herman wrote: > > > > So, if you were doing more than responding to Adrian's DCO worry here > (which I do not share) the above is what I have against harvesting the > addresses into a _way_ too public place/format. It's a matter of scale; as > opposed to the SCM metadata, your tree itself is way too public to put > anything in without very definite and explicit approval. I feel. > > > > This, Jon, by the way also suggests something which I would consider much > better; _keep_ it as SCM metadata in some less-accesible format under .git/
The decision to keep it in .mailmap format was made before I was involved. A smaller .mailmap has been in the tree since 2007. Existing tools will need to be changed if the location is moved.
> > I doubt anyone's going to come up with an objection then. It's already in > that exact same spot after all. > > Rene. >
-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com
| |