lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 463 kernel developers missing!
On 7/30/08, Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> wrote:
> On 30-07-08 21:41, Rene Herman wrote:
>
>
> > So, if you were doing more than responding to Adrian's DCO worry here
> (which I do not share) the above is what I have against harvesting the
> addresses into a _way_ too public place/format. It's a matter of scale; as
> opposed to the SCM metadata, your tree itself is way too public to put
> anything in without very definite and explicit approval. I feel.
> >
>
> This, Jon, by the way also suggests something which I would consider much
> better; _keep_ it as SCM metadata in some less-accesible format under .git/

The decision to keep it in .mailmap format was made before I was
involved. A smaller .mailmap has been in the tree since 2007. Existing
tools will need to be changed if the location is moved.

>
> I doubt anyone's going to come up with an objection then. It's already in
> that exact same spot after all.
>
> Rene.
>


--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-30 22:31    [W:0.136 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site