Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | | Subject | [PATCH] lockdep: change scheduler annotation | | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | | Date | Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:26:57 +0200 |
| |
While thinking about David's patch it _finally_ dawned on me that there is no reason we have a lock class per cpu..
Sorry for being dense :-/
The below changes the annotation from a lock class per cpu, to a single nested lock, as the scheduler never holds more that 2 rq locks at a time anyway.
If there was code requiring holding all rq locks this would not work and the original annotation would be the only option, but that not being the case, this is a much lighter one.
Compiles and boots on a 2-way x86_64.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> --- kernel/sched.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c @@ -600,7 +600,6 @@ struct rq { /* BKL stats */ unsigned int bkl_count; #endif - struct lock_class_key rq_lock_key; }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues); @@ -2759,10 +2758,10 @@ static void double_rq_lock(struct rq *rq } else { if (rq1 < rq2) { spin_lock(&rq1->lock); - spin_lock(&rq2->lock); + spin_lock_nested(&rq2->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); } else { spin_lock(&rq2->lock); - spin_lock(&rq1->lock); + spin_lock_nested(&rq1->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); } } update_rq_clock(rq1); @@ -2805,10 +2804,10 @@ static int double_lock_balance(struct rq if (busiest < this_rq) { spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock); spin_lock(&busiest->lock); - spin_lock(&this_rq->lock); + spin_lock_nested(&this_rq->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); ret = 1; } else - spin_lock(&busiest->lock); + spin_lock_nested(&busiest->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); } return ret; } @@ -8000,7 +7999,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void) rq = cpu_rq(i); spin_lock_init(&rq->lock); - lockdep_set_class(&rq->lock, &rq->rq_lock_key); rq->nr_running = 0; init_cfs_rq(&rq->cfs, rq); init_rt_rq(&rq->rt, rq);
|  |