[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [git pull] cpus4096 fixes
On Monday 28 July 2008 18:16:39 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rusty Russell <> wrote:
> > Mike: I now think the right long-term answer is Linus' dense cpumap
> > idea + a convenience allocator for cpumasks. We sweep the kernel for
> > all on-stack vars and replace them with one or the other. Thoughts?
> The dense cpumap for constant cpumasks is OK as it's clever, compact and
> static.
> All-dynamic allocator for on-stack cpumasks ... is a less obvious
> choice.

Sorry, I was unclear. "long-term" == "more than 4096 CPUs", since I thought
that was Mike's aim. If we only want to hack up 4k CPUS and stop, then I
understand the current approach.

If we want huge cpu numbers, I think cpumask_alloc/free gives the clearest
code. So our approach is backwards: let's do that *then* put ugly hacks in
if it's really too slow.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-28 15:25    [W:0.149 / U:1.936 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site