Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:54:11 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Let HP iLO driver depend on PCI |
| |
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:41:31 +0200 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:15:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:35:02 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:56:52 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Three weeks and nobody did an allmodconfig build on linux-next for s390 > > > > or m68k (at least). > > > > > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ > > > > > > > Wow, lots of red. > > > > May I revise my comment? Three weeks and nobody did anything about the > > failing allmodconfig builds on linux-next and s390 (at least). > > Not true. I sent patches for all (s390) build failures two weeks ago. > Nobody cared. Patch for this specific build failure is available > here http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=121577361309086&w=2 .
I doubt if the hpilo developers are watching linux-next for patches.
Stephen will have seen it and he might play the feed-it-over-to-the-culprit game. But usually I do that.
It's always appreciated if the patch-creator can identify the appropriate individuals for the Cc: as well.
> > Is anyone actively monitoring that page and doing the requisite culprit-poking? > > Where to send patches to?
Me, lkml, Stephen, maintainer(s).
> And who takes care they get integrated before > the merge window opens?
Usually me. Maintainers will sometimes integrate the fix directly but the success rate via that route is distressingly low.
| |