Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:18:51 -0600 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: post 2.6.26 requires pciehp_slot_with_bus |
| |
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:38:38PM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > >The hard part is figuring out a convention that we can all agree > >on. ;) I've no strong feelings here, but of the options > >presented, I lean towards "2a", "2b" or "2-1", "2-2". > > > > Only my hope is I don't want to look "2a" or "2-1" on normal platform. > It should be "2" on normal platform.
Yes, the first slot will be "2", the second slot "2a" or "2-1" or whatever we decide. I don't have a strong feeling about the name.
-- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."
| |