[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: post 2.6.26 requires pciehp_slot_with_bus
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:38:32 +0900
Kenji Kaneshige <> wrote:

> Hi Pierre,
> (Added linux-pci to CC)
> Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > Somewhere post 2.6.26, pciehp started whining about not being able to
> > claim the slot and error code -17. It suggested adding
> > "pciehp_slot_with_bus", which actually helped. Still, having a kernel
> > parameter should just be a temporary fix.
> The "pciehp_slot_with_bus" option is a workaround for the platforms
> that assign the same physical slot number to multiple slots. If your
> system has PCI chassis and it supports Chassis Number registers,
> maybe one of the solution is using chassis number + slot number as a
> slot name. But I don't have any idea other than "pciehp_slot_with_bus"
> if your system doesn't support chassis number.

The what now? :)

This is a laptop with a single expressport that worked fine up until
this merge window. What changed and why is it no longer possible to
support this hardware without a kernel parameter?

-- Pierre Ossman

Linux kernel, MMC maintainer
rdesktop, core developer

WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-24 22:41    [W:0.064 / U:6.600 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site