lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: + pm-introduce-new-interfaces-schedule_work_on-and-queue_work_on.patch added to -mm tree
    On 07/22, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
    >
    > On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 08:21:49PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
    > >
    > > So, this is used in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16707
    > >
    > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/poweroff.c 2008-06-30 16:01:35.000000000 +0800
    > > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/poweroff.c 2008-07-03 10:50:05.000000000 +0800
    > > @@ -25,7 +25,8 @@
    > >
    > > static void handle_poweroff(int key, struct tty_struct *tty)
    > > {
    > > - schedule_work(&poweroff_work);
    > > + /* run sysrq poweroff on boot cpu */
    > > + schedule_work_on(first_cpu(cpu_online_map), &poweroff_work);
    > > }
    > >
    > > static struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_poweroff_op = {
    > >
    > > A couple of silly questions, I don't understand the low-level details.
    > >
    > > This patch (and kernel_power_off() afaics) assumes that the boot cpu
    > > can't be cpu_down()'ed. Is it true in general? For example, grep shows
    > > that arch/s390/kernel/smp.c:topology_init()->smp_add_present_cpu()
    > > sets ->hotpluggable = 1 for all present CPUs?
    >
    > I tried this on a Power system sometime back and I was able to
    > offline CPU0.

    This means that

    pm-schedule-sysrq-poweroff-on-boot-cpu.patch

    is not 100% right. It is still possible to hang/deadlock if we race
    with cpu_down(first_cpu(cpu_online_map)).

    The bug is mostly theoretical, but perhaps should be fixed anyway,
    handle_poweroff() can use kthread_run().

    Oleg.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-07-24 14:43    [W:0.024 / U:0.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site