lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Bug 11046] New: Kernel bug in mm/bootmem.c on Sparc machines
From
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:20:49 -0700

> On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:02:28 -0700 (PDT) bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11046
...
> > Here is the BUG:
> >
> > [ 0.000000] PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 'OBP 4.11.5 2003/11/12 10:40'
> > [ 0.000000] PROMLIB: Root node compatible:
> > [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.25.10 (root@sparc1) (gcc version 4.1.2
> > 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #5 SMP Sun Jul 6 21:05:42 CEST 2008
> > [ 0.000000] console [earlyprom0] enabled
> > [ 0.000000] ARCH: SUN4U
> > [ 0.000000] Ethernet address: 00:03:ba:7a:f3:d6
> > [ 0.000000] Kernel: Using 2 locked TLB entries for main kernel image.
> > [ 0.000000] Remapping the kernel... done.
> > [ 0.000000] kernel BUG at mm/bootmem.c:125!

This can only happen if you attach a zero-sized initrd to the kernel.

I see platforms like x86 sometimes have explicit checks for a zero
size to guard reserve_bootmem() and similar calls, but if that's what
callers are all going to do doesn't it make better sense for
reserve_bootmem_core() to just return instead of BUG on a zero size
argument?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-24 05:29    [W:0.071 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site