lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 23 Jul 2008 09:32:33 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [git pull] x86: declaration fixes - ver2
* Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@infradead.org> wrote:

> Hello Ingo,> > Here are updated patches for x86-tip.> > The following changes since commit a099a9b18ab434594bb01ed920e8c58574203fa9:
>   Ingo Molnar (1):
>         Merge branch 'out-of-tree'

looks good, but could you please switch over the changes to be based on 
the "upstream" topic branch of your patches, i.e. to tip/x86/prototypes?

You can do it the following way:

  git checkout master
  git merge tip/master                                  # get latest
  git checkout -b x86/prototypes-for-tip                # new pull branch
  git rebase --onto tip/x86/prototypes tip/master       # switch

In theory this should run just fine without any conflicts or manual 
intervention needed.

If that rebase command ran fine, double-check the end result by looking 
at the output of:

  git log tip/x86/prototypes..x86/prototypes-for-tip

... then resend the pull request for the x86/prototypes branch you have, 
by doing something like:

git-request-pull tip/x86/prototypes git://git.infradead.org/users/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip.git x86/prototypes-for-tip

The reason for not basing your branch on tip/master is that we want to 
keep x86/protypes topic a "pure" topic that is mergable without waiting 
for other topics - without mixing it with all other topics that are 
integrated into tip/master.

And note that x86/prototypes-for-tip is a by-line branch that you should 
not touch after sending the pull request (so that what i pull matches up 
to the summary in the email you send) - you can still evolve your master 
branch with other work, create other branches, etc.

Let me know if there's any Git hickup.

Thanks,

	Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-23 09:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2008