lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: circumvention and ignorance (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 22)
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:49:30 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Looking at today's http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/matrix/, there's
> plenty of red, and not only in the linux-next division :-(
>
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > We are up to 105 trees (counting Linus' and 14 trees of patches pending for
> > Linus' tree), more are welcome (even if they are currently empty).
> > Thanks to those who have contributed, and to those who haven't, please do.
>
> We still see regular merging of trivially breaking patches that
> apparently never have been in linux-next...
>
> > The ttydev tree was partially merged upstream and gained so many
> > conflicts that I have temporarily dropped it.
>
> Worse, we're seeing things getting merged that have been known-broken in
> several linux-next incarnations during the last few weeks...
>
> Now we have such a great thing like linux-next (thanks, Stephen! You
> saved my day a lot lately), perhaps we should start making full use of
> it?

E.g., we don't seem to have a good method of moving build fixes into their
appropriate tree/patchset. Or maybe it's just that we can't get them
noticed by the appropriate people.

---
~Randy
Linux Plumbers Conference, 17-19 September 2008, Portland, Oregon USA
http://linuxplumbersconf.org/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-23 05:13    [W:0.031 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site