lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 22 Jul 2008 14:30:33 -0500
FromLarry Finger <>
SubjectRe: Kernel WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1330 __netif_schedule+0x2c/0x98()
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Larry Finger wrote:
>> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> Larry Finger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> =============================================
>>>> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
>>>> 2.6.26-Linus-git-05752-g93ded9b #49
>>>
>>>                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ dirty?
>>>
>>> This kernel is not using the patches we sent.
>>
>> No, but they didn't make any difference. I tried with all 3 applied, 
>> then backed them out one by one. That was the state when I posted before.
> 
> Well, this is a completely different warning.
> 
>>
>> Here are the dumps with all 3 patches applied:
>>
>> =============================================
>> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
>> 2.6.26-Linus-05752-g93ded9b-dirty #53
>> ---------------------------------------------
>> b43/1997 is trying to acquire lock:
>>  (_xmit_IEEE80211#2){-...}, at: [<ffffffffa028f322>] 
>> ieee80211_scan_completed+0x130/0x2e1 [mac80211]
>>
>> but task is already holding lock:
>>  (_xmit_IEEE80211#2){-...}, at: [<ffffffffa028f322>] 
>> ieee80211_scan_completed+0x130/0x2e1 [mac80211] 

Sorry. After all those kernel builds I got bleary-eyed and just looked for 
recursive locking without any regard for the details.

Larry


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-22 21:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2008