[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Imprecise timers.
    On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:19:02 +0200
    Rene Herman <> wrote:

    > On 22-07-08 05:02, David Woodhouse wrote:
    > > Many users of timers don't really care too much about exactly when
    > > their timer fires -- and waking a CPU to satisfy such a timer is a
    > > waste of power. This patch implements a 'range' timer which will
    > > fire at a 'convenient' moment within given constraints.
    > >
    > > It's implemented by a deferrable timer at the beginning of the
    > > range, which will run some time later when the CPU happens to be
    > > awake. And a non-deferrable timer at the hard deadline, to ensure
    > > it really does happen by then.
    > Are there actually users for this (not just in theory)? The
    > deferrable timer sort of sounds like all I'd ever want if I, as you
    > say, wouldn't really care...

    there's a few; mostly around hardware timeout..For example Stephen want
    it for his drivers.

    EXT3 journal flushing is another one where we can easily say
    "between 4 and 7 seconds" rather than "exactly at 5"

    If you want to reach me at my work email, use
    For development, discussion and tips for power savings,

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-07-22 14:57    [W:0.020 / U:26.336 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site