lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BUG] CFS vs cpu hotplug
2008/7/2 Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The following oops still occurred whether this patch is applied or not.
>>
>>> [<ffffffff8059372c>] notifier_call_chain+0x33/0x5b
>>> [<ffffffff802476a9>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x9/0xb
>>> [<ffffffff802476ba>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0xf/0x11
>>> [<ffffffff805736d6>] _cpu_down+0x191/0x256
>>> [<ffffffff805737c1>] cpu_down+0x26/0x36
>>> [<ffffffff805749c1>] store_online+0x32/0x75
>>> [<ffffffff803d1982>] sysdev_store+0x24/0x26
>>> [<ffffffff802d2551>] sysfs_write_file+0xe0/0x11c
>>> [<ffffffff80290e6b>] vfs_write+0xae/0x137
>>> [<ffffffff802913d3>] sys_write+0x47/0x70
>>> [<ffffffff8020b1eb>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80
>>
>> hm, there were multiple problems in this area and a lot of dormant bugs.
>> Do you have this recent upstream commit in your tree:
> Hi, Ingo
> I tested it again with the most recent upstreams(including the
> following patch) committed, the oops still occurred.

[ taken from the oops ]
>
> kernel BUG at kernel/sched.c:6133!
>

is it BUG_ON(rq->nr_running != 0); in your sched.c?

hum, it's line #6134 in the recent sched.c version. So with the recent
version it was "kernel BUG at kernel/sched.c:6134!" right?

could you please try to get a crash with my additional debugging patch
(you may find it in this thread) applied?
We should see then all tasks that have been migrated (or failed to be
migrated) during migration_call(CPU_DEAD, ...).

TIA,

--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-02 10:53    [W:0.072 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site