[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Removing sysdevs?
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 23:57 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The plan is:
> > - remaining driver core cleanups to allow for multiple drivers
> > to be bound to individual devices
> > - add multiple binding support to the core
> > - migrate existing sysdevs to struct device, now that multiple
> > binding is allowed
> > - delete sysdev structure
> > - profit!
> I hope the sysdev semantics of running with interrupts etc. will be kept?

What "running with interrupts" ? :-) Are you talking specifically about
suspend/resume ? In this case, normal devices also provide irq_off
variants of suspend/resume.

In some areas, those semantics are even a problem for sysdevs. For
example, it's been a pain in the neck for cpufreq on powermac not to be
able to schedule in its suspend routine. Among others...


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-03 00:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site