![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:26:56 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com> wrote: > > >> Hello, >> >> Christoph suggested me to repost v18 for merging in -mm, to give it more >> exposure before the .27 merge window opens. There's no code change compared to >> the previous v18 submission (the only change is the correction in the comment >> in the mm_take_all_locks patch rightfully pointed out by Linus). >> >> Full patchset including other XPMEM support patches can be found here: >> >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.6/2.6.26-rc7/mmu-notifier-v18 >> >> Only the three patches of the patchset I'm submitting here by email are ready >> for merging, the rest you can find in the website is not ready for merging yet >> for various performance degradations, lots of the XPMEM patches needs to be >> elaborated to avoid any slowdown for the non-XPMEM case, but I keep >> maintaining them to make life easier to XPMEM current development and later we >> can keep work on them to make them suitable for inclusion to avoid any >> performance degradation risk. >> > > I'm a bit concerned about merging the first three patches when there > are eleven more patches of which some, afacit, are required to make > these three actually useful. Committing these three would be signing a > blank cheque. > > The first three are useful for kvm, gru, and likely drm and rdma nics. It is only xpmem which requires the other eleven patches. > Because if we hit strong objections with the later patches we end up in a > cant-go-forward, cant-go-backward situation. > > No, we end up in a some-people-are-happy, some-have-to-redo-their-homework situation. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-07-02 07:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||