Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 1/3] fastboot: Create a "asynchronous" initlevel | From | Daniel Walker <> | Date | Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:08:05 -0700 |
| |
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 08:35 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Ok .. I'm not trying to rush you .. With that said, the increased > > number of threads seems like a natural direction to take.. I would > > assume the returns would diminish depending on the number of threads > > per the hardware.. For instance , your addition of one thread might > > even harm the boot time on some single core embedded systems .. > > well it still improves the cases where msleep() happens... even on > single core. (fwiw the test machine I reported numbers from is single > core, albeit with hyperthreading) >
How did you measure the boot time? I didn't notice any infrastructure for that in the patches..
Daniel
| |