lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] net/ipv4/tcp.c: Fix use of PULLHUP instead of POLLHUP in comments.
Date
From: Will Newton <will.newton@gmail.com>

Change PULLHUP to POLLHUP in tcp_poll comments and clean up another
comment for grammar and coding style.

Signed-off-by: Will Newton <will.newton@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 1d723de..b343ce3 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ unsigned int tcp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
return inet_csk_listen_poll(sk);

/* Socket is not locked. We are protected from async events
- by poll logic and correct handling of state changes
- made by another threads is impossible in any case.
+ * by poll logic and correct handling of state changes
+ * made by other threads is impossible in any case.
*/

mask = 0;
@@ -373,10 +373,10 @@ unsigned int tcp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
* in state CLOSE_WAIT. One solution is evident --- to set POLLHUP
* if and only if shutdown has been made in both directions.
* Actually, it is interesting to look how Solaris and DUX
- * solve this dilemma. I would prefer, if PULLHUP were maskable,
+ * solve this dilemma. I would prefer, if POLLHUP were maskable,
* then we could set it on SND_SHUTDOWN. BTW examples given
* in Stevens' books assume exactly this behaviour, it explains
- * why PULLHUP is incompatible with POLLOUT. --ANK
+ * why POLLHUP is incompatible with POLLOUT. --ANK
*
* NOTE. Check for TCP_CLOSE is added. The goal is to prevent
* blocking on fresh not-connected or disconnected socket. --ANK
--
1.5.5.2


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-16 17:33    [W:0.041 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site